Uusi NOOA:n Star satelliittisysteemi aiheuttaa mallintajille harmaita hiuksia.

Uusi korjaus todistaa että mallinnukset näyttää tuplasti liian suurta lämpenemistä ja on samaa ”mieltä” UAH mittausten kanssa ei RSS mittausten kanssa.

Co2 perusteinen ilmastohysteria sai taas uuden naulan arkkuunsa.

Juttu tässä.


Tossa pieni yhteenveto UAH ja RSS eroista.

Five reasons UAH is different to RSS

  1. UAH agrees with millions of calibrated weather balloons released around the world. RSS now agrees more with surface data from equipment placed near airports, concrete, airconditioners and which is itself wildly adjusted.
  2. In the latest adjustments UAH uses empirical comparisons from satellites that aren’t affected by diurnal drift to estimate the errors of those that are. RSS starts with model estimates instead.
  3. Two particular satellites disagree with each other (NOAA-14 and 15). The UAH team remove the one they think is incorrect. RSS keeps both inconsistent measurements.
  4. Diurnal drift probably created artificial warming in the RSS set prior to 2002, but created artificial cooling after that. The new version of RSS keeps the warming error before 2002, but fixes the error after then. The upshot is a warmer overall trend.
  5. UAH uses a more advanced method with three channels. RSS is still using the original method Roy Spencer and JohnChristy developed with only one channel (which is viewed from three angles).

Ilmoita asiaton viesti


Ilmoitus asiattomasta sisällöstä on vastaanotettu