Lindtman vie SDP:tä äärivasemmistoon Lähi-idän politiikassa

Question:
Doesn’t the IDF do the same as Hamas?

ChatGPT:
Yes, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have been accused of violating international law in ways similar to Hamas, especially regarding the treatment of civilians and the use of force in populated areas. While the IDF argues that it takes measures to minimize civilian casualties, human rights groups and international organizations have raised concerns about their actions. Here’s a look at some of the key accusations against the IDF that mirror those often directed at Hamas:

1. Civilians in Conflict Zones
While the IDF does claim to take precautions such as warning civilians before strikes (e.g., via leaflets, phone calls, or ”roof knocking”), many international observers argue that the scale of their attacks on densely populated areas in Gaza still leads to excessive civilian casualties, which may violate the principle of proportionality. Despite their efforts to minimize civilian harm, the destruction of homes, schools, and hospitals continues to raise concerns under international law.

2. Attacks on Civilian Infrastructure
The IDF has been accused of targeting civilian infrastructure under the justification that it is being used by Hamas for military purposes. However, destroying essential infrastructure such as hospitals, water treatment plants, and schools can disproportionately affect civilians, even if the military value is argued to be significant.

3. Indiscriminate Bombardment
Like Hamas, the IDF has faced allegations that its airstrikes in Gaza sometimes do not sufficiently distinguish between combatants and civilians, leading to significant civilian casualties. The IDF uses advanced weaponry, but critics argue that in densely populated areas, such attacks still lead to excessive harm to civilians, which violates international law’s requirement to distinguish between combatants and civilians.

4. Use of Force in Civilian Areas
While Hamas has been criticized for embedding its military infrastructure within civilian areas, the IDF’s military operations in these areas are also heavily scrutinized. Critics argue that when IDF strikes these locations, the risk to civilians is disproportionately high, and it may not meet the international law standard of proportionality.

5. Treatment of Detainees
There have been reports of mistreatment of Palestinian prisoners, including minors, by Israeli forces. This is viewed as a violation of international human rights law. Allegations of torture, unlawful detention, and denial of fair trial rights are frequently raised by human rights groups concerning Israel’s handling of Palestinian prisoners.

6. Collective Punishment
The blockade imposed by Israel on Gaza, as well as the restrictions on movement and goods, is often described as a form of collective punishment under international law. Collective punishment is prohibited by the Fourth Geneva Convention, and critics argue that Israel’s actions severely affect Gaza’s civilian population by restricting access to essential supplies such as food, medical care, and fuel.

7. Use of Live Ammunition
During protests, particularly those at the Gaza border (like the ”Great March of Return” in 2018), the IDF has been accused of using excessive force, including live ammunition, against Palestinian civilians, resulting in many deaths and injuries. Human rights groups have claimed that Israel’s use of lethal force in these contexts may violate international human rights and humanitarian law, especially when protesters were unarmed.

‎
Conclusion
While the IDF asserts that it operates within the bounds of international law and makes efforts to avoid civilian harm, its actions in Gaza have drawn significant criticism. Both sides of the conflict, Hamas and the IDF, have been accused of actions that violate international humanitarian law, particularly in their treatment of civilians and conduct in densely populated areas. International bodies like the United Nations, the International Criminal Court (ICC), and human rights organizations have all called for investigations into possible war crimes committed by both parties in the ongoing conflict.